Case LawHigh Court › Ma/416/2015 Of Paras Enterprises v. Inco...

Ma/416/2015 Of Paras Enterprises v. Income Tax Officer Ward 5 4 Patna

High Court 18 Jul 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Ma/416/2015 Of Paras Enterprises v. Income Tax Officer Ward 5 4 Patna
Date of order
18 Jul 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ma/416/2015 Of Paras Enterprises v. Income Tax Officer Ward 5 4 Patna, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

7 18-07-2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNAMiscellaneous Appeal No.416 of 2015 ====================================================== Paras Enterprises, a proprietary concern having its office at 10, Jagdish LokApartment, Boring Canal Road, P.O. Boring Road, P.S. Buddha Colony,District Patna through its proprietor Punit Jain, son of Shri. Rajesh KumarJain, resident of 502, Ganga Prabha Apartment Road No.2, Manas Marg, WestShiv Puri P.O.+P.S. Shastri Nagar, District Patna ... ... Appellant/s Versus 1.Income Tax Officer Ward 5 4 Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :For the Appellant/s: Mr.D.V. Pathy, Adv.For the Respondent/s: Mr.Archana Sinha @ Archana Shahi, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN) Heard Mr. D.V. Pathy, learned counsel for thepetitioner and Ms. Archana Sinha, learned Senior StandingCounsel for the Income Tax Department. This appeal under Section 260A of the Income TaxAct, 1961, is directed against the order dated 28.05.2015 of theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal dismissing the appeal. Having heard learned counsel for the parties andconsidering the opinion expressed by the Appellate Tribunal todismiss the appeal and to confirm the order passed by the theAssessing Authorities and the Commissioner, IncomeTax(Appeals), in so far as the issue of additions are concerned, Bibhash/-U we are not persuaded to grant indigence for in our opinion noissue muchless any substantial question of law arises in thisappeal which invites our opinion. With the observations above, we dispose of thisappeal. (Jyoti Saran, J) ( Partha Sarthy, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan