Case Law › High Court › Ma/471/2011 Of Nagendra Pd v. Commission...

Ma/471/2011 Of Nagendra Pd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Pa

High Court 21 Oct 2021 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · patnahcucisdb94

Parties

Date of order

21 Oct 2021

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Ma/471/2011 Of Nagendra Pd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Pa, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The present appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNAMiscellaneous Appeal No.471 of 2011 ====================================================== Nagendra Prasad, Son of Late Suraj Prasad, R/o Harihar Apartment, EastBoring Canal Road, P.S. Budha Colony, District-Patna. CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTAORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date : 21-10-2021 The present Miscellaneous Appeal has beenpreferred against the order dated 21.01.2011, passed in ITA No.170/Pat/2010, by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Patna Bench,Patna (Annexure-3). Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permissionto withdraw the present appeal for the reason that the appellanthas taken recourse to the settlement scheme under theprovisions of the The Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Bill, 2020,and has been accorded the desired relief. Permission granted. The present appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. Interlocutory Application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (Sanjay Karol, CJ) P.K.P./Amrendra (Rajan Gupta, J) AFR/NAFRCAV DATEUploading Date22.10.2021Transmission Date

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.