Madhuben Jaisinghbhai K. Harijan v. The Dy. Commissioner Of Income
High Court
18 Jan 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Madhuben Jaisinghbhai K. Harijan v. The Dy. Commissioner Of Income
Date of order
18 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Madhuben Jaisinghbhai K. Harijan v. The Dy. Commissioner Of Income, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.3165 OF 2006
Madhuben Jaisinghbhai K. Harijan .. Petitioner.
Versus
The Dy. Commissioner of Income
Tax & Others .. Respondents.
Mr.M.H. Solkar for the petitioner.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & J.P. DEVADHAR, J. DATED : 18th January, 2008
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. &
J.P. DEVADHAR, J.
J.P. DEVADHAR, J.
J.P. DEVADHAR, J.
DATED : 18th January, 2008
P.C. :
1. We have heard the learned counsel for the
petitioner. Challenge in the present writ petition
is to the order dated 13/16-5-2005 passed by the
respondents. In our view the order does not suffer
from any infirmity in law or on facts. However, the
learned counsel appearing for the petitioner was not
really pressing the reliefs in this writ petition
and prays that the respondents may be directed to
furnish the details of the benefits which were
available to the deceased, so that he can take steps
to obtain succession certificate in accordance with
law.
2. We dispose of this writ petition with a
direction to the respondents to furnish details of
2
the benefits admissible and/or payable to the
deceased in accordance with law to the petitioner
within eight weeks from today.
CHIEF JUSTICE
J.P. DEVADHAR, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.