Case LawHigh Court › Madhur Aggarwal v. Income Tax Officer De...

Madhur Aggarwal v. Income Tax Officer Delhi Tax Circle 16 1 & Ors

High Court 05 Apr 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Madhur Aggarwal v. Income Tax Officer Delhi Tax Circle 16 1 & Ors
Date of order
05 Apr 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Madhur Aggarwal v. Income Tax Officer Delhi Tax Circle 16 1 & Ors, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 2.Accordingly, the writ petition shall stand dismissed subject to liberty being reserved in favour of the writ petitioner to adopt appropriate statutory remedies.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~75 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4984/2024 MADHUR AGGARWAL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sandeep Joshi and Mr. Sanjeev Chaudhary, Advs. versus INCOME TAX OFFICER DELHI TAX CIRCLE 16 1 & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Shlok Chandra, SSC along with Ms. Madhavi Shukla and Ms. Priya Sarkar, JSCs. Mr. Varun Vats, SPC for UOI-R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R% 05.04.2024 CM APPL 20391/2024 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 4984/2024 and CM APPL 20390/2024 (Interim relief) 1.We find no justification to entertain the instant writ petition bearing in mind the undisputed fact that it is directed against a final assessment order which has come to be framed on termination of proceedings referable to Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [‘Act’] and in respect of which the petitioner has statutory alternative and efficacious remedies. 2.Accordingly, the writ petition shall stand dismissed subject to liberty being reserved in favour of the writ petitioner to adopt appropriate statutory remedies. 3.All rights and contentions of parties are kept open. YASHWANT VARMA, J. APRIL 05, 2024/RW PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan