Madhusudan C. Parikh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
17 Jul 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Madhusudan C. Parikh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
17 Jul 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Madhusudan C. Parikh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-)
MGN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.542 OF 2005
Madhusudan C. Parikh ..Appellant
Vs.
Commissioner of Income Tax,
City-XVI, Mumbai ..Respondents
Mr. B.V. Jhaveri, for the Appellant.
Mr. A. Kotangale, for respondent.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.DATED: 17TH JULY,2007
CORAM: F.I.
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATED: 17TH JULY,2007
P.C.:
P.C.:
. The order dated 6th June, 2006 would mean that
the Appeal stands withdrawn. However, there is no
order as to refund of Court Fees. In the light of
that the order dated 6th June, 2007 is modified to
the following effect:-
"Refund of Court Fees as per Rules.
Certified copy expedited."
. Prothonotary & Senior Master to issue
certified copy of the order dated 6th June, 2007
after carrying out the above corrections in the
order.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue