Madurai District v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
27 Feb 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · mdubench
Parties
Madurai District v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
27 Feb 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Madurai District v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 3904 of 2023 In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid clarifications.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
W.P. (MD) No. 3904 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 27.02.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.D. AUDIKESAVALU
W.P. (MD) No. 3904 of 2023andW.M.P. (MD) No.3741 and 3743 of 2023
M.D.SPL.35, Balakrishna Maravapatti Primary
Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society Ltd.,
Rep. through its Secretary,
Maravapatti-625 707, M.Puliyiankulam Post,
Thirumangalam Taluk,
Madurai District.
... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Income Tax Officer,
O/o.Income Tax, TDS Ward,
Madurai ME, Income Tax Staff Quarters Complex,
Kulamangalam Main Road,
Meenambalpuram,
Madurai-625 002.
2.The Managing Director / Joint Registrar
of Cooperative Societies,
Madurai District Central Cooperative Bank,
North Veli Street, Madurai - 625 001.
1/6
3.The Registrar of Cooperative Societies,
170 Periyar EVR High Road,
Kilpauk,
Chennai – 10.
W.P. (MD) No. 3904 of 2023
4.The Principal Secretary to Government, Cooperation, Food and Cooperation, Food and
Consumer Protection Department,
Secretariat, Chennai - 9.
... Respondents
PRAYER:Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issue of Writ of Certiorari, calling for the entire records relating to the impugned orders
passed by the 1[st]respondent in DIN and Letter No. ITBA/COM/F/17/2019-20/1026504034(1) dated 12.03.2020 and DIN and Letter No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2021-22/1041514498(1) dated 25.03.2022 and consequential circular of the 2[nd] respondent in Na.Ka. 4145/2020-21va.1 dated 31.03.2021 respectively quash the same.
For Petitioner
For R1
For R2
For R3 and R4
: Mr. V.O.S.Kalaiselvam
:Mr. N.Dilipkumar
Senior Standing Counsel
:Mr. D.Shanmugarajasethupathy
:Mr. R.Baskaran,
Additional Advocate General
Assisted by Mr. A.Baskaran Additional Government Pleader
2/6
O R D E R
W.P. (MD) No. 3904 of 2023
Heard Mr. V.O.S.Kalaiselvam, Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner, Mr. N.Dilip Kumar, Learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the First Respondent, Mr. D.Shanmugarajasethupathy, Learned Standing Counsel for the Second Respondent and Mr. R.Baskaran, Learned Additional Advocate General, assisted by Mr. A.Baskaran, Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the Third and Fourth Respondents and perused the materials placed on record, apart from the pleadings of the parties.
2.This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the Circulars issued by the District Co-operative Banks informing the Petitioners about the enforcement of tax deduction at source as per Section 194-N of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for cash withdrawals exceeding Rs.1 crore and from their accounts from District Co-operative Banks.
3/6
W.P. (MD) No. 3904 of 20233.It has been brought to notice that the Hon'ble Chief Minister has sent a letter dated 24.03.2020 to the Hon'ble Finance Minister, Government of India, and that the Chief Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, has sent a Letter in D.O. Lr. No. 15350/CC1/2022 dated 27.09.2022 to the Chairperson, Central Board of Direct Taxes, New Delhi, making requests to exempt the Primary Agricultural Co-operative Credit Societies and other Primary Co-operative Societies from the provisions of Section 194-N of the Income Tax, 1961, for the cash withdrawal exceeding Rs. 1 crore from their accounts from District Co-operative banks.
4.In view of the same, Learned Counsel for the Petitioners seek permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition reserving the rights of the Petitioner to pursue the matter for exemption and if any adverse order is passed, to work out its remedies in that regard before the proper forum in the manner recognized by law and he has made endorsement to that effect in the court record.
W.P. (MD) No. 3904 of 2023
In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the
aforesaid clarifications. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are
closed. No costs.
Index : Yes/NoNCC : Yes /No
ta
27.02.2023
Note: Issue order copy by 23.05.2023.
To
4.In view of the same, Learned Counsel for the Petitioners seek permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition reserving the rights of the Petitioner to pursue the matter for exemption and if any adverse order is passed, to work out its remedies in that regard before the proper forum in the manner recognized by law and he has made endorsement to that effect in the court record.
W.P. (MD) No. 3904 of 2023
In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the
aforesaid clarifications. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are
closed. No costs.
Index : Yes/NoNCC : Yes /No
ta
27.02.2023
Note: Issue order copy by 23.05.2023.
To
1.The Income Tax Officer, O/o.Income Tax, TDS Ward, Madurai ME, Income Tax Staff Quarters Complex, Kulamangalam Main Road, Meenambalpuram,
Madurai-625 002.
2.The Managing Director / Joint Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Madurai District Central Cooperative Bank,
North Veli Street,
Madurai - 625 001.
3.The Registrar of Cooperative Societies,
170 Periyar EVR High Road,
Kilpauk,
Chennai – 10.
P.D. AUDIKESAVALU, J.
4.The Principal Secretary to Government, Cooperation, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 9.
6/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P. (MD) No. 3904 of 2023
ta
W.P.(MD)No. 3904 of 2023
27.02.2023
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.