Mahalaxmi Infraprojects Limited v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
11 Feb 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mahalaxmi Infraprojects Limited v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
11 Feb 2013
Assessment year(s)
2005-2006, 2003-2004
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Mahalaxmi Infraprojects Limited v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.
Issue: Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case on a proper and reasonable interpretation of S.80IA(4), the Tribunal is right in holding that Government or Statutory body is the developer of infrastructure facility and here appellant is not entitled todeductionunderthatsection?
Decision: 5.The appeal is accordingly disposed of with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1459 OF 2011
Mahalaxmi Infraprojects LimitedVersus
.. Appellant
Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax,.. Respondent KolhapurMr.S.N.Inamdar, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Mihir Naniwadekar for the Appellant.
.. Respondent
Mr. Vimal Gupta, Sr.Advocate with Padma Divakar for the Respondent.
CORAM : J.P.DEVADHAR &M.S.SANKLECHA, J.J. DATE : 11[th] FEBRUARY, 2013.
P.C.
Matter not on Board. Mentioned. At the request of the
parties the matter is heard.
2. In this appeal, the Assessee has in respect of assessment year 2005-2006 raised the following question of law for our
consideration.
Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case on a proper and reasonable interpretation of S.80IA(4), the Tribunal is right in holding that Government or Statutory body is the developer of infrastructure facility and here appellant is not entitled todeductionunderthatsection?
3.The Tribunal, while dismissing the the Assessee's Appeal,
followed its order for assessment year 2003-2004 while denying the
deduction claimed under section 80 IA(4) of the Income Tax Act. The order of the Tribunal for the assessment year 2003-2004 has been set aside by this Court in Appeal filed by the Appellant being I.T. Appeal No.4610 of 2010 on 30[th] August, 2011 and restored to the Tribunal for a fresh decision.
3.For the reasons mentioned in the order dated 30[th] August, 2011, we set aside the impugned order relating to assessment year 2005-2006 and restore the matter to the file of the Tribunal, for fresh decision in accordance with law.
4.All the contentions of the parties are kept open to be urged before the Tribunal.
5.The appeal is accordingly disposed of with no order as to
costs.
(M.S.SANKLECHA,J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.