In Maharaja Surajmal Brij Vishwavidhalaya v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4335/2022
Maharaja Surajmal Brij Vishwavidhalaya
Versus
Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
----Petitioner
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Siddharth RankaMs. Apeksha BapnaMr. Rohan Chatter For Respondent(s): Mr. Shantanu SharmaMr. Anurag Mathur
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
Order
01/07/2024
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during thependency of the writ petition the impugned order, appeal againstthe impugned assessment order dated 30.03.2022 has been filed.
In view of the subsequent developments, the petition isdisposed of with liberty to the petitioner to pursue the statutoryremedy.
(ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J(AVNEESH JHINGAN),J
Chandan/TANISHA /56
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue