Maharashtra Oil Extraction } Pvt. Ltd. } v. The Assistant Commissioner } Of Income Tax And Ors. }
High Court
30 Mar 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Maharashtra Oil Extraction } Pvt. Ltd. } v. The Assistant Commissioner } Of Income Tax And Ors. }
Date of order
30 Mar 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Maharashtra Oil Extraction } Pvt. Ltd. } v. The Assistant Commissioner } Of Income Tax And Ors. }, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 784 OF 2016
Maharashtra Oil Extraction}Pvt. Ltd.}PetitionerversusThe Assistant Commissioner}of Income Tax and Ors.}Respondents
Mr. J. D. Mistri - Senior Advocate with Mr. Bharath Janarthanan i/b. Mr. Atul K. Jasani for the petitioner.
None for the respondents.
CORAM :-S. C. DHARMADHIKARI &G. S. KULKARNI, JJ.
DATED :-MARCH 30, 2016
P.C. :-
In terms of the instructions received by the petitioner's advocate, leave to withdraw the writ petition is granted. The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. There would be no order as to costs. Ad-interim order, if any, to stand vacated forthwith.
(G.S.KULKARNI, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue