In Mahendra P.kanakia v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.32 OF 2008INWRIT PETITION NO.685 OF 2008
Mahendra P.Kanakia
Vs.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
..Petitioner
..Respondent
Mr.A.K.Sharma with V.S.Hadade for the Petitioner.Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATE : 31ST MARCH, 2008
P.C.
Mumbai-400051 as Respondent Nos.2 and 3.
of prayer clause (a). Amendment to be carried out
within a period of two weeks from today.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue