Case LawHigh Court › Mahesh Kumar Soni v. State Of Rajasthan...

Mahesh Kumar Soni v. State Of Rajasthan Through P.p

High Court 09 Jan 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Mahesh Kumar Soni v. State Of Rajasthan Through P.p
Date of order
09 Jan 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mahesh Kumar Soni v. State Of Rajasthan Through P.p, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH ATJAIPUR S.B.CR. MISC. (SUSPENSION OF SENTENCE) APPL.No.15/2017. IN S.B.Criminal Appeal No. 1509/2016. Mahesh Kumar Soni S/o Shri Magan Lal Soni, Branch Manager,R.F.C. Kota, Aged About 48 Years, R/o 4, Income Tax Colony,Ajmer, Raj., At Present R/o A-338, Talvandi, Kota, Raj. (At Presentin Central Jail, Kota). Versus State of Rajasthan Through P.P. ----Appellant ----Respondent _____________________________________________________ For Appellant(s) : Mr. Rajesh Sharma For State : Mr. Sudesh Kumar Saini, P.P. _____________________________________________________ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR AGARWAL Order 09/01/2017 Heard learned counsel for the parties. On consideration of submissions made on behalf of therespective parties and the material made available for my perusal as well asevidence produced during trial and more particularly looking to the amountof gratification and also the fact that the decision of the appeal is likely totake time, but without expressing any final opinion on the merit and de-merit of the case, I am inclined to suspend the sentence awarded to himduring the pendency of the appeal. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence isallowed. It is ordered that the sentence awarded to accused-applicant Mahesh Kumar Soni S/o Shri Magan Lal Soni in Sessions Case No.13/2005shall remain suspended on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- andtwo sureties bond of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trialCourt to the effect that he shall appear before this Court on 9.2.2017 and asand when called upon to do so. (PRASHANT KUMAR AGARWAL),J. A.Arora/-Item No.67.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan