Mahindra And Mahindra Ltd., Mumbai v. Additional Director Income Tax
High Court
11 Jul 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mahindra And Mahindra Ltd., Mumbai v. Additional Director Income Tax
Date of order
11 Jul 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mahindra And Mahindra Ltd., Mumbai v. Additional Director Income Tax, the High Court (2023) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Prajakta Vartak
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 84 OF 2007AND
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 67 OF 2007ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 68 OF 2007ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 69 OF 2007ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 76 OF 2007ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 70 OF 2007ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 71 OF 2007ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 72 OF 2007ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 73 OF 2007ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 83 OF 2007ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 85 OF 2007ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 86 OF 2007ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 74 OF 2007ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 75 OF 2007
Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd., Mumbai..AppellantVs. Additional Director Income Tax..Respondent
AND
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 411 OF 2007
ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 413 OF 2007
Page 1 of 2
-------------------------11 July, 2023
Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd., MumbaiVs. Deputy Director Income Tax (InternationalTaxation) Range 1 (2), Mumbai
..Appellant
..Respondent
ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 414 OF 2007
Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd., MumbaiVs. Addl. Director Income Tax (InternationalTaxation) Range 1, Mumbai
__________
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr. Sanjiv Shah for the Appellant.
Mr. Suresh Kumar for Respondent.
__________
CORAM :G. S. KULKARNI & JITENDRA JAIN, JJ.DATE :JULY 11, 2023
P.C.:
1.Mr. Sanjiv Shah, learned counsel for the appellant, on instructions,
seeks leave to withdraw these appeals.
2.Allowed to be withdrawn. Disposed of. No costs.
3.The questions of law as raised in the appeals are kept open.
4.Refund of Court Fees as per rules.
[JITENDRA JAIN, J.]
[G. S. KULKARNI, J.]
-------------------------
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue