In Mait/108/2008 Of Aarti Jaiswal v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2021) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the appellant to takeappropriate steps under the scheme.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The High Court Of Madhya PradeshMAIT-108-2008
(AARTI JAISWALVs INCOME TAX OFFICER)
[22][-][02][-][2021]Jabalpur, Dated :
Shri Nitin Agrawal, learned counsel for the appellant.
Shri Ajay Yadav, learned counsel on behalf of Shri Sanjay Lal, learnedcounsel for the respondent.
Heard on I.A.No.1179/2021 which is an application filed by theapplicant seeking permission to withdraw the Appeal on the ground that theappellant has opted for settlement under Vivad se Vishwas scheme.
On due consideration, I.A.No.1179/2021 is allowed.
Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the appellant to takeappropriate steps under the scheme.
(PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA)JUDGE
(VIRENDER SINGH)JUDGE
anandDigitally signed by ANAND KRISHNA SEN Date: 2021.02.23 17:47:35 +05'30'
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue