Case LawHigh Court › Mait/14/2006 Of Dy.commission Of Income...

Mait/14/2006 Of Dy.commission Of Income Tax [Astt.] v. M/S The Bhopal Sugar Industries Ltd

High Court 09 May 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · mphc_db_jbp
Parties
Mait/14/2006 Of Dy.commission Of Income Tax [Astt.] v. M/S The Bhopal Sugar Industries Ltd
Date of order
09 May 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Mait/14/2006 Of Dy.commission Of Income Tax [Astt.] v. M/S The Bhopal Sugar Industries Ltd, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn in view of the CBDT circular dated 11.07.2018.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

The High Court Of Madhya PradeshMAIT-14-2006 (DY.COMMISSION OF INCOME TAX [ASTT.]Vs M/S THE BHOPAL SUGAR INDUSTRIES LTD.) [09][-][05][-][2019]Jabalpur, Dated :Jabalpur, Dated : Shri Shishir Verma, Advocate on behalf of Shri Sanjay Lal, Advocate for the appellant. Shri Gaurav Tiwari, Advocate for the respondent.Heard on I.A. No.5677/2019. This is an application for withdrawal of the appeal. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the appeal in view of the circular of Government ofIndia, Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), CentralBoard of Direct Taxes (Judicial Cell) dated 11.07.2018. In view of the aforesaid, I.A. No.5677/2019 standsallowed and closed. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn in view of the CBDT circular dated 11.07.2018. However, we make it clear that we have not touched themerits of the case and have kept the questions open to bedecided in appropriate case. (S.K. SETH)(VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA)CHIEF JUSTICEJUDGE rao
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan