Case LawHigh Court › Mait/82/2004 Of Commissioner Of Income T...

Mait/82/2004 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax,Jabalpur v. M/S Malloolal Gokul Prasad

High Court 20 Jan 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · mphc_db_jbp
Parties
Mait/82/2004 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax,Jabalpur v. M/S Malloolal Gokul Prasad
Date of order
20 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
1991-92
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Mait/82/2004 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax,Jabalpur v. M/S Malloolal Gokul Prasad, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.

Decision: Since the monetary limit involved in this appeal pertaining to Assessment Year 1991-92 is only in the sum of Rs.49,863/- (which is less than 20,00,000/-), in view of the Circular dated 10[th] December, 2015, issued under the signature of Commissioner of Income Tax (AJ), C.B.D.T., Government of India...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

MAIT No.82/2004 20.1.2016 Shri Sanjay Lal, Advocate for the appellant. Since the monetary limit involved in this appeal pertaining to Assessment Year 1991-92 is only in the sum of Rs.49,863/- (which is less than 20,00,000/-), in view of the Circular dated 10[th] December, 2015, issued under the signature of Commissioner of Income Tax (AJ), C.B.D.T., Government of India, New Delhi, which is placed on record, this appeal is disposed of leaving questions of law open. (A.M. Khanwilkar) Chief Justice Anchal (Sanjay Yadav) Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan