Case LawHigh Court › Mallika Sarabhai Trust v. Commissioner O...

Mallika Sarabhai Trust v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

High Court 30 Jul 1998 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Mallika Sarabhai Trust v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Date of order
30 Jul 1998
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mallika Sarabhai Trust v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, the High Court (1998) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In these circumstances, this reference also stands disposed of unanswered.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 409 of 1992 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE C.K.THAKKER and MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- MALLIKA SARABHAI TRUST NO 12 Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR R.K.PATEL and B.D.Karia for Petitioner MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent. -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE C.K.THAKKER and MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL Date of decision: 30/07/98 ORAL JUDGEMENT �The following questions are referred for the opinion of this Court:- "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the assessee was not entitled to exemption u/s 47(vii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961?" "Whether, the Appellate Tribunal is right in law and on facts in holding that when the assessee received shares debentures and bonds of amalgamated companies, there was no transfer under section 2(47) of the Incometax Act and consequently no capital gains tax could be charged?" �The matter was decided in favour of assessee in view of the earlier decision by the authorities, including the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, and the concession made before the Tribunal. In fact, in COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX v. LEENA SARABHAI (N.CH.), 221 ITR 520, when the matter reached this Court, in view of peculiar facts and circumstances, the question was left unanswered. In these circumstances, this reference also stands disposed of unanswered. In the facts and circumstances, no order as to costs. ���***
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan