Mallika Sarabhai Trust v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax
High Court
30 Jul 1998 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Mallika Sarabhai Trust v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Date of order
30 Jul 1998
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mallika Sarabhai Trust v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, the High Court (1998) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In these circumstances, this reference also stands disposed of unanswered.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 409 of 1992
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE C.K.THAKKER and
MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL
============================================================
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy
of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution
of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
--------------------------------------------------------------
MALLIKA SARABHAI TRUST NO 12
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
MR R.K.PATEL and B.D.Karia for Petitioner
MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent.
--------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : MR.JUSTICE C.K.THAKKER and
MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL
Date of decision: 30/07/98
ORAL JUDGEMENT
�The following questions are referred for the
opinion of this Court:-
"Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of
the case, the Tribunal was right in law in
holding that the assessee was not entitled to
exemption u/s 47(vii) of the Income Tax Act,
1961?"
"Whether, the Appellate Tribunal is right in law
and on facts in holding that when the assessee
received shares debentures and bonds of
amalgamated companies, there was no transfer
under section 2(47) of the Incometax Act and
consequently no capital gains tax could be
charged?"
�The matter was decided in favour of assessee in
view of the earlier decision by the authorities,
including the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, and the
concession made before the Tribunal. In fact, in
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX v. LEENA SARABHAI (N.CH.),
221 ITR 520, when the matter reached this Court, in view
of peculiar facts and circumstances, the question was
left unanswered. In these circumstances, this reference
also stands disposed of unanswered. In the facts and
circumstances, no order as to costs.
���***
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.