In Mallikarjun Chanbasappa Nadgadali v. Income Tax Officer And Others, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
WP.378.2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.378 OF 2013
Mallikarjun Chanbasappa Nadgadali
versus
Income Tax Officer and others
Petitioner
Respondents
None present for the parties.
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD AND A.A.SAYED, JJ.
PC :
DATE : 3 May 2013
1.The Petitioner and his Advocate are absent. Dismissed in default.
(DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.)
MST
(A.A.SAYED, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.