Case LawHigh Court › Mamta Sharma v. The Commissioner, Income...

Mamta Sharma v. The Commissioner, Income Tax-Ii, Central Revenue Building, Birchand

High Court 11 Mar 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Mamta Sharma v. The Commissioner, Income Tax-Ii, Central Revenue Building, Birchand
Date of order
11 Mar 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Mamta Sharma v. The Commissioner, Income Tax-Ii, Central Revenue Building, Birchand, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.

Decision: Petition is summarily rejected.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNACivil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4945 of 2014 ====================================================== Mamta Sharma, D/O Jai Nandan Sharma, resident of at- Dhwaja Vill, Nandan Puri, Maurya Path, Khajpura, P.S.- Rajeev Nagar, P.O.- Veterinary College, District- Patna- 800014. .... .... Petitioner Versus 1.The Commissioner, Income Tax-II, Central Revenue Building, Birchand Patel Path, Patna. 2.The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central-II), New Delhi. 3.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-17, New Delhi. 4.Income Tax Officer, Ward-5(2), Lok Nayak Jai Prakash Bhawan, Freser Road, Patna. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Krishna Mohan Mishra, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha, Senior Standing Counsel Mrs. Archana Prasad, Junior Standing Counsel ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGHORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 2. 11-03-2014 This Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution has been filed by assessee against the order of transfer of the case made under Section 127 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. We have heard the learned advocates extensively and have considered the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of M/s Ajantha Industries and others v. Sunil/- Central Board of Direct Taxes, New Delhi and others and of Calcutta High Court in the matter of Dilip Kumar Agarwal and another vs. Commissioner of Income Tax [{2009} 314 ITR 291 (Cal)]. Petition is summarily rejected. (R.M. Doshit, CJ) (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan