Mamta Sharma v. Income Tax Officer Ward 29 1 And Anr

$~8 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 18005/2024, CM APPL. 76584/2024 & CM APPL. 76585/2024 MAMTA SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Antra Mishra, Mr. Jaspal Singh Sethi and Mr. Manoj K. Khanna, Advocates. versus INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 29 1 AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anurag Ojha, SSC with Mr. V.K. Saksena and Ms. Hemlata Rawat, JSCs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA O R D E R % 28.01.20251.Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel representing the respondents has stated that pursuant to the impugned notice the final assessment order has already been passed. 2.Accordingly, the writ petition has been rendered infructuous. At this stage learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has challenged the assessment order by filing a Commissioner Appeal before the CIT Appeals. He prays that some direction may be issued to the appellate authority to expedite the proceedings of the appeal filed by the petitioner. 3.Thus, we direct that the proceedings of the appeal pending before the CIT Appeal against the final assessment order shall be expedited and concluded within a period of six weeks from today. concluded within a period of six weeks from today. 4.This order shall be communicated by learned counsel representing the respondent to the CIT Appeals concerned. 5.Writ petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. respondent to the CIT Appeals concerned. 5.Writ petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ JANUARY 28, 2025yrj TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J