In Manas Agro Industries And Infrastructure Ltd. Mumbai v. The Income Tax Officer Ward- 3(2)(2), Mumbai And Ors, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
YUGANDHARASHARADPATIL
Digitally signedbyYUGANDHARASHARAD PATILDate:2023.06.0810:57:38 +0530
Yugandhara Patil
444-WP-1310-2020.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1310 OF 2020
Manas Agro Industries and Infrastructure Ltd. MumbaiVersusThe Income Tax Officer Ward- 3(2)(2), Mumbai and Ors.
… Petitioner
… Respondents
******
Ms. Aasifa Khan for Petitioner.Mr. Akhileshwar Sharma a/w Ms. Shilpa Goel for Respondent-Revenue.
******
CORAM: K.R.SHRIRAM & M.M.SATHAYE JJ.
DATE : 6[th] JUNE 2023
P.C. :-
1.Ms. Khan, learned counsel for Petitioner states that Petitioner
has already adopted alternative remedy and has filed appealalongwith stay application.
2.Ms. Khan states that leave be granted to withdraw the petition
with liberty to take all grounds before the appellate authority.
3.Petition disposed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
[M.M.SATHAYE,J.]
[K.R.SHRIRAM, J.]
1 /1
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue