Manasarovar,5A,Alwarpet, Chennai v. The Income Tax Officer Company Ward 4(2), Room
High Court
08 Jul 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Manasarovar,5A,Alwarpet, Chennai v. The Income Tax Officer Company Ward 4(2), Room
Date of order
08 Jul 2022
Assessment year(s)
2014-15
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Manasarovar,5A,Alwarpet, Chennai v. The Income Tax Officer Company Ward 4(2), Room, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: This writ petition stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
W.P.No.13798 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 08.07.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH
W.P.No.13798 of 2019
&
W.M.P.Nos.13874 & 13875 of 2019
M/s.Narayana Swamy Building Creators Private Limited
Rep by its Managing Director K.Narayanasamy,No.66, C.P.Ramasamy Road,
Manasarovar,5A,Alwarpet, Chennai
...Petitioner.
Vs.
1.The Income Tax Officer Company Ward 4(2), Room No.432, 4[th] Floor, Main Building, 121, Utthamar Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034.
2.The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,
Corporate Circle 4(2), Chennai.
3.The Branch Manager,
Indian Bank, Old No.116, New No.56, Dr.Radha Krishnan Salai,
1/4
W.P.No.13798 of 2019
Chennai – 600 004.
...Respondents.
Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the entire records on the file of the 2[nd] respondent vide proceedings in P.A.No.AACCN3209M dated 18.02.2019, quash the same and to pass such further order or orders deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice.
For Petitioner: Mr.D.Udhayasuriyan
For Respondents: Mr.D.Prabhu Mukund Arun Kumar Junior Standing Counsel for R1 & R2: -NA- for R3.
ORDER
Heard Mr.D.Udhayasuriyan, learned Counsel for the petitioner
and Mr.D.Prabhu Mukund Arun Kumar, learned Junior Standing Counsel for R1 and R2. There is no representation for R3.
2. The challenge is to a notice issued under Section 226(3) of
the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short 'Act') by R2 to R3, bringing to the notice of R3, the Branch Manager of the Indian Bank, that an amount of Rs.66,62,220/- was due from the petitioner and appropriating the balance
2/4
W.P.No.13798 of 2019
in the bank accounts of the petitioner in that Bank to the extent of the liability.
3. There is nothing untoward in the impugned notice, insofar as
admittedly, the demand as aforesaid arises from an order of assessment
passed under the provisions of the Act for the assessment year 2014-15. As against the order of assessment, an appeal was filed before the first Appellate Authority, which has, admittedly, been dismissed as on 10.11.2017 and no appeal has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order of first Appellate Authority. Hence the Department was within its domain to recover the amount coercively.
4. This writ petition stands dismissed. Connected writ miscellaneous petitions are also dismissed. No costs.
nst
08.07.2022
Index : Yes / NoSpeaking Order / Non-Speaking Order
3/4
To
W.P.No.13798 of 2019
DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J.nst
1.The Income Tax Officer
Company Ward 4(2),
Room No.432, 4[th] Floor,
Main Building, 121, Utthamar Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034.
2.The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,
Corporate Circle 4(2), Chennai.
W.P.No.13798 of 2019
&
W.M.P.Nos.13874 & 13875 of 2019
08.07.2022
4/4
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.