Case LawHigh Court › Mandakiniben Gunvantbhai Patel v. Income...

Mandakiniben Gunvantbhai Patel v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(3)(1

High Court 21 Jun 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Mandakiniben Gunvantbhai Patel v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(3)(1
Date of order
21 Jun 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Mandakiniben Gunvantbhai Patel v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(3)(1, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Permission, as sought for, is granted.The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.Notice is discharged.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABADR/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5446 of 2022 ================================================================ MANDAKINIBEN GUNVANTBHAI PATEL VersusINCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(3)(1) ================================================================Appearance:UMAIDSINGH BHATI(7973) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1DS AFF.NOT FILED (N) for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2================================================================ CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.J.DESAIand HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA Date : 21/06/2022 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.J.DESAI) Learned advocate Mr.Abhimanyu SinghBhati appearing on behalf of learned advocateMr.Umaidsingh Bhati for the petitioner, underinstructions, seeks permission to withdraw thispetition in view of the subsequent developmenti.e. passing of the Assessment Order dated25.03.2022 by the respondent authority. Permission, as sought for, is granted.The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.Notice is discharged. (A.J.DESAI, J) (BHARGAV D. KARIA, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan