In Manekchowk & A'bad Mfg.co.ltd.through Official Liquiator v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2001) decided the matter.
Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- MANEKCHOWK & A'BAD MFG.CO.LTD.THROUGH OFFICIAL LIQUIATOR Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 183 of 1985
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH
and
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
============================================================
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO
to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO
of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO --------------------------------------------------------------
MANEKCHOWK & A'BAD MFG.CO.LTD.THROUGH OFFICIAL LIQUIATOR
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. INCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 183 of 1985 OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR for Petitioner. MR BB NAYAK FOR MR MR BHATT for Respondent.
--------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH
and
MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
Date of decision: 14/09/2001
(Per : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH)
�This Reference was made at the instance of the
assessee way back in the year 1985. Inspite of passage of 15 years the Paper Book is not filed, nor has any one appeared for the assessee, though the assessee has been
served.
2�In view of the above, we decline to answer the
questions referred for the opinion of this Court.
3�The Reference is accordingly disposed of with no
order as to costs.
���(M.S.Shah, J)�(D.A.Mehta, J)
m.m.bhatt
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.