Case LawHigh Court › Maniklal Bhattacharya v. Income Tax Offi...

Maniklal Bhattacharya v. Income Tax Officer

High Court 23 Nov 2012 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Maniklal Bhattacharya v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
23 Nov 2012
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Maniklal Bhattacharya v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 3-Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawnwith aforesaid liberty.— Sd/-G.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
^:.X-\;^^^^^V'-:--TL'c' -^ - (^/JHE_H_Qh['BLE_HLGH^OURTOFJUDICATUREFOR CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPURTax Case No.2-of 2012Appellant^Maniklal BhattacharyaAssessee'^^^-H.No. 19/20 4th FloorDhebar Tower, Byron Bazar.^..••^s^:^^--"Raipur (C.G.)Versus^y^',...••"•'"RespondentIncome Tax Officer,Circie2(4)Raipur(C.G.)iViemo of Appeal under section 26Q^Aof the Income Tax;^')Act1961 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DB: HON'BLEMR. ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE &HON'BLE MR. G. MINHAJUDDIN. JJ. Tax Case No.02 of 2012 Appellant Maniklal Bhattacharya Respondent Versus Income Tax Officer Present: Shri Neelabh Dubey, counsel for the appellant.Shri Anand Dadariya, counsel for the respondent. O R D ER (Passed on 23rd November, 2012) Thefollowingorderofpassedby Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. orderoftheCourtwas Learned counsel for the appellant submits that hedoes not wishto prosecute thisappeal and $eekstowithdraw this appeal with liberty to take recourse to anyother remedy that may be available to him. 2.We accept the above submission made by learnedcounsel for the appellant. 3-Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawnwith aforesaid liberty.— Sd/-G. MinhajuddinJudge Sd/-Abhay Manohar SapreJudge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan