In Manish Babulal Chordiya v. Income Tax Officer Ward 3(1)(5, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: Accordingly, the present Tax Appeal stands disposed of asnot pressed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/TAX APPEAL NO. 159 of 2022
=============================================MANISH BABULAL CHORDIYA PROP OF M/S FINE STAR
Versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 3(1)(5)
=============================================
Appearance:
MR KETAN H SHAH(2705) for the Appellant(s) No. 1MR. AMAN K SHAH(9992) for the Appellant(s) No. 1 for the Opponent(s) No. 1
=============================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALAandHONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE NISHA M. THAKORE
Date : 29/03/2022
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA)
Mr. Ketan H. Shah, the learned counsel appearing for theappellant does not press this Tax Appeal.
Accordingly, the present Tax Appeal stands disposed of asnot pressed.
(J. B. PARDIWALA, J)
(NISHA M. THAKORE,J)
NEHA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue