Manish Bhardwaj v. Income Tax Officer, Gurgaon And Others
High Court
29 Jan 2015 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Manish Bhardwaj v. Income Tax Officer, Gurgaon And Others
Date of order
29 Jan 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Manish Bhardwaj v. Income Tax Officer, Gurgaon And Others, the High Court (2015) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH
CWP15122015
Decided on : 29.01.2015
Manish Bhardwaj..... Petitioner
VERSUS
Income Tax Officer, Gurgaon and others
we. Respondents
CORAMHON3BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLAHON3BLE MR. JUSTICK HARINDER SINGH SIDHU
PresentMr.Deepak Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioner.KK OK K
RAJIVE BHALLA, J. (QRAL)
The petitioner challenges assessment proceedings,assessment order, penalty proceedings, demand notice andattachment of his bank account without appending any documentwhether in the shape of assessment order, demand notice or any otherrelevant document that may enable us to consider the petitioner'sgrievance that assessment and penalty proceedings were finalisedwithout due service or raising a demand notice.
Consequently, we are unable to entertain the presentpetition but grant liberty to the petitioner to approach the departmentfor supply of relevant orders/documents by filing an appropriateapplication. In case, such an application is filed within 15 days, allrequisite orders/documents shall be supplied to the petitioner withina week thereafter. After receipt of all relevant orders/documents, thepetitioner would be at liberty to avail his remedy in accordance withlaw.
Disposed of accordingly.
| RAJIVE BHALLA |
JUDGE
QQ OL2I01L5 |
Shamsher S.Sabharwal
| HARINDER SINGH SIDHU |
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.