In Manish I. Lalwani v. Gangapurwala And, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: 3.Writ petition is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYBENCH AT AURANGABAD
973 WRIT PETITION NO. 33 OF 2014
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-II, NASHIKVERSUS
MANISH I. LALWANI
...
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Alok M. SharmaAdvocate for Respondent No. 1 :Mr. Subhodh P. Shah
…
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND
S. G. DIGE, JJ.
DATE : 8[th] MARCH, 2022
PER COURT :-
1. Mr. Sharma, learned counsel for petitioner placed on record thecommunication dated 14-02-2022. The same is taken on record andmarked as ‘X’ for identification.
2.The learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner doesnot want to prosecute the petition on merits.
3.Writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
( S.G. DIGE )
JUDGE
( S.V. GANGAPURWALA ) JUDGE
mtk
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue