In Manish Maheshwari v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Reported In, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In the result, the Appeal is, therefore, dismissed for want of substantial questions of law with no order as to costs. [R.M.SAVANT, J] [V C DAGA, J]
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1 IT APPEAL NO.3134-09
mmj
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3134 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax-IT KolhapurVs.
Shri Ramchandra Mahadeo Patil
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr. Vimal Gupta for the AppellantMr. S. N. Inamdar for the Respondent
CORAM :V C DAGA AND R M SAVANT, JJ.DATE :20[th] September, 2010
P.C.
1Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.
2Perused Appeal
3The view taken by the Tribunal cannot be faulted with. As a matter of
fact, the said view is in consonance with a view of the Apex Court in the case of
Manish Maheshwari Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax reported in
(2007) 289 ITR 341(SC). In the result, the Appeal is, therefore, dismissed for want of substantial questions of law with no order as to costs.
[R.M.SAVANT, J]
[V C DAGA, J]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue