Case LawHigh Court › Manish Rasiklal Satra v. Income Tax Offi...

Manish Rasiklal Satra v. Income Tax Officer Ward 28(2)(1) & Ors

High Court 05 Feb 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Manish Rasiklal Satra v. Income Tax Officer Ward 28(2)(1) & Ors
Date of order
05 Feb 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Manish Rasiklal Satra v. Income Tax Officer Ward 28(2)(1) & Ors, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

Digitallysigned byMEERAMEERAMAHESHMAHESHJADHAVJADHAVDate:2024.02.0714:14:56+0530 1/2 411-WPL-3412-23.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTIONWRIT PETITION NO. 3412 OF 2023 Manish Rasiklal Satra ...Petitioner Versus Income Tax Officer Ward 28(2)(1) & Ors ...Respondents ---- Mr Dharan V Gandhi a/w Ms Aanchal Vyas for Petitioner.Mr Arjun Gupta for Respondents-Revenue. ---- CORAM : K. R. SHRIRAM & Dr. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ.DATED : 5[th] FEBRUARY 2024 P.C. : 1Counsel for petitioner states that this petition will be covered by the judgment of New India Assurance Co. Ltd. V/s Assistant Commissioner ofIncome Tax, Circle 3(2)(1), Mumbai & Ors.[1]. Counsel for respondentsagree. 2Therefore, impugned orders passed under Section 148 (A)d of theIncome Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) and the notices issued under Section 148 of the Act in the respective petitions are hereby quashed and set aside. 3Petition disposed. 4Consequential notices or orders, if any, also stand quashed and set aside. 1. 2024 SCC OnLine Bom 146 5All other rights and contentions which have been raised in thepetition are also kept open. (Dr. NEELA GOKHALE, J.) (K. R. SHRIRAM, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan