Case Law β€Ί High Court β€Ί Manishankar Jayanthi v. The Commissioner...

Manishankar Jayanthi v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Aayakar Bhawan

High Court 26 Sep 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court Β· hc_cis_mas
Parties
Manishankar Jayanthi v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Aayakar Bhawan
Date of order
26 Sep 2025
Assessment year(s)
2023-2024
Outcome
Other

The order β€” as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Manishankar Jayanthi v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Aayakar Bhawan, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.

Decision: This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations.

Summary auto-generated from the order below β€” read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

W.P.No.37288 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 26.09.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN W.P.No.37288 of 2025 and W.M.P.Nos.41723 and 41724 of 2025 Manishankar Jayanthi,W/o.Manishankar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Aayakar Bhawan, 121, M G Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034. 2.The Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Non-Corporate Circle 3(1), Chennai, Wanaparthy Block, Aayakar Bhawan, 121, M G Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the Original DIN and Letter No.ITBA/COM/F/17/2025-2026/1078915550(1) dated 25.07.2025, passed by the 2[nd] Respondent and consequently restrain the Respondents from taking any coercive recovery steps pursuant to the Assessment Order dated 24.03.2025. For Petitioner: Mr.Tarun Rao KallakuruFor Respondents: Mrs.S.Premalatha Senior Standing Counsel ____________ Page No. 1 of 7 ORDER Mrs.S.Premalatha, learned Senior Standing Counsel takes notice for the Respondents. 2. This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the time of admission with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Respondents. 3. In this Writ Petition, the Petitioner has challenged the impugned Order dated 25.07.2025 passed by the 2[nd] Respondent under Section 220(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 4. The Petitioner individual has suffered an adverse Assessment Order dated 24.03.2025 for the Assessment Year 2023-2024. The Petitioner against the said order has filed an appeal before the 1[st] Respondent Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) under Section 246A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 5. Similarly, the Petitioner filed a stay application before the 2[nd ] W.P.No.37288 of 2025 Respondent/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessing Officer), which has been disposed of by the 2[nd] Respondent vide impugned Order dated 25.07.2025, calling upon the Petitioner to deposit 20% of the disputed tax in terms of Instruction No.1914 of the Central Board of Direct Taxes dated 02.12.1993 and its subsequent amendments wherein, it has been stated that mere filing of appeal against the Assessment Order will not be sufficient reason to stay the recovery of demand. 6. It appears that in the aforesaid impugned Order dated 25.07.2025, the amount supposedly due from the Petitioner is Rs.1,45,35,470/- and therefore the Petitioner has been called upon to pay a sum of Rs.29,07,094/- on or before 31.07.2025 failing which, the Petitioner was intimated that collection/recovery process will be initiated against the Petitioner. 7. The learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the impugned Order dated 25.07.2025 has been mechanically passed by the 2[nd ]Respondent relying on the Instruction No.1914 of the Central Board of Direct Taxes dated 02.12.1993 stating that mere filing an appeal against the Assessment Order will not be sufficient reason to stay the recovery of demand without going into the merits. Hence, prays for allowing this Writ ____________ Page No. 3 of 7 W.P.No.37288 of 2025 Petition. 8. I have heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Respondents and perused the materials available on record. 7. The learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the impugned Order dated 25.07.2025 has been mechanically passed by the 2[nd ]Respondent relying on the Instruction No.1914 of the Central Board of Direct Taxes dated 02.12.1993 stating that mere filing an appeal against the Assessment Order will not be sufficient reason to stay the recovery of demand without going into the merits. Hence, prays for allowing this Writ ____________ Page No. 3 of 7 W.P.No.37288 of 2025 Petition. 8. I have heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Respondents and perused the materials available on record. 9. Since the Petitioner has already filed an appeal before the 1[st ]Respondent/Appellate Authority and considering the fact that the Petitioner is an individual and taking note of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in LG ElectronicsIndia Private Limited Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, (2013) 140 ITD 41 (Del), this Court is inclined to modify the impugned Order dated 25.07.2025, by directing the Petitioner to deposit Rs.15,00,000/- within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 10. In case the Petitioner complies with the same by depositing the aforesaid amount and furnishes the proof of the same with the 1[st ]Respondent/Appellate Authority, the 1[st] Respondent/Appellate Authority ____________Page No. 4 of 7 W.P.No.37288 of 2025 shall dispose of the appeal on merits without reference to the aspect of limitation. 11. In case the Petitioner fails to comply with the condition stipulated above, the 2[nd] Respondent is at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today. 12. Needless to state, before passing any such order, the 2[nd] Respondent shall give due notice to the Petitioner. 13. In view of the above, all further recovery proceedings shall be kept in abeyance and shall be subject to the Petitioner complying with the above stipulated condition. 14. This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 26.09.2025 Neutral Citation : Yes / No ____________ Page No. 5 of 7 arb To: 1.The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Aayakar Bhawan, 121, M G Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034. Aayakar Bhawan, 121, M G Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034. 2.The Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Non-Corporate Circle 3(1), Chennai, Wanaparthy Block, Aayakar Bhawan, 121, M G Road, Nungambakkam, Non-Corporate Circle 3(1), Chennai, Wanaparthy Block, Aayakar Bhawan, 121, M G Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034. ____________ Page No. 6 of 7 W.P.No.37288 of 2025 C.SARAVANAN, J. arb ____________ Page No. 7 of 7 W.P.No.37288 of 2025 W.P.No.37288 of 2025andW.M.P.Nos.41723 and 41724 of 2025 26.09.2025
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
βœ… File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) β†’ πŸ’¬ Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only β€” not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press Β· Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
Β© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP Β· LLPIN ACN-4920 Β· Jaipur, Rajasthan