Case LawHigh Court › Manjoor Ahmed v. Commi. Of Income Tax-Ii...

Manjoor Ahmed v. Commi. Of Income Tax-Ii Jodhpur & Ors

High Court 05 Mar 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Manjoor Ahmed v. Commi. Of Income Tax-Ii Jodhpur & Ors
Date of order
05 Mar 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Manjoor Ahmed v. Commi. Of Income Tax-Ii Jodhpur & Ors, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- SPL. APPL. WRIT No. 173 of 2008 MANJOOR AHMED V/S COMMI. OF INCOME TAX-II JODHPUR & ORS. Mr. DINESH MEHTA, for the appellant / petitioner Mr. KK BISSA, for the respondent Date of Order : 5.3.2008 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. HON'BLE SHRI DEO NARAYAN THANVI,J. ORDER ----- Heard learned counsel for the parties. Without going into the hyper technicalities andniceties of the matter, in the totality of circumstances,we think it appropriate to dispose the present appeal withthe direction to the Department to complete the assessmentproceedings consequent upon notice under Section 148 withina period of two months, excluding the time, that may betaken by the assessee, and till then the attachment of thesaving bank account of the appellant shall continue. It isfurther clarified that if the assessment proceedings arenot completed within the aforesaid time, the attachmentwill automatically come to an end, without reference to theCourt. It is also expected that the department willconclude the assessment proceedings in a objective anddispassionate manner.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan