Manjoor Ahmed v. Commi. Of Income Tax-Ii Jodhpur & Ors
High Court
05 Mar 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Manjoor Ahmed v. Commi. Of Income Tax-Ii Jodhpur & Ors
Date of order
05 Mar 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Manjoor Ahmed v. Commi. Of Income Tax-Ii Jodhpur & Ors, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR --------------------------------------------------------
SPL. APPL. WRIT No. 173 of 2008
MANJOOR AHMED
V/S
COMMI. OF INCOME TAX-II JODHPUR & ORS.
Mr. DINESH MEHTA, for the appellant / petitioner Mr. KK BISSA, for the respondent
Date of Order : 5.3.2008
HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J.
HON'BLE SHRI DEO NARAYAN THANVI,J.
ORDER
-----
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Without going into the hyper technicalities andniceties of the matter, in the totality of circumstances,we think it appropriate to dispose the present appeal withthe direction to the Department to complete the assessmentproceedings consequent upon notice under Section 148 withina period of two months, excluding the time, that may betaken by the assessee, and till then the attachment of thesaving bank account of the appellant shall continue. It isfurther clarified that if the assessment proceedings arenot completed within the aforesaid time, the attachmentwill automatically come to an end, without reference to theCourt. It is also expected that the department willconclude the assessment proceedings in a objective anddispassionate manner.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.