In Manjula Finances Ltd v. The Commisisoner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIR-184
+ ITA 388/2004
MANJULA FINANCES LTD.
Through: None.
..... Appellant
versus
THE COMMISISONER OF INCOME TAX
.... Respondent
Through: Mr. Dileep Shivpuri, Senior standing counsel with Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Jr. Standing counsel.
CORAM:
JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
O R D E R% 09.05.2016
1. None appears for the Appellant. It seems that the Appellant is not interested in pursuing the appeal. The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
2. It is made clear that the application for restoration will be entertained only if it is supported by the affidavit of the party concerned. Also, an advance copy should be served on the counsel who appeared last for the Respondent.
S. MURALIDHAR, J
MAY 09, 2016/Rm
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue