Case LawHigh Court › Manoj Kesharichand Sandesara v. Income T...

Manoj Kesharichand Sandesara v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 14(3)(1), Mumbai

High Court 28 Jan 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Manoj Kesharichand Sandesara v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 14(3)(1), Mumbai
Date of order
28 Jan 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Manoj Kesharichand Sandesara v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 14(3)(1), Mumbai, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONWRIT PETITION NO.213 OF 2020 Manoj Kesharichand SandesaraVs.Income Tax Officer, Ward 14(3)(1), Mumbai ...Petitioner...Respondent Mr. Sankalp Sharma i/b. Mr. Prem Jha for Petitioner. CORAM : K. R. SHRIRAM &N. J. JAMADAR, JJ.DATE :JANUARY 28, 2022 P.C.:- 1.Mr. Sharma, on instructions from Mr. Prem Jha, seeks leave of theCourt to withdraw the petition. 2.Petition dismissed as withdrawn. (N. J. JAMADAR, J.) (K. R. SHRIRAM, J.) Minal Parab
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan