Manoj Kumar v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ludhiana And Another
High Court
18 Feb 2020 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Manoj Kumar v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ludhiana And Another
Date of order
18 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
1989-90
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Manoj Kumar v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ludhiana And Another, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: Whether speaking/ reasoneda.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
445IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH
RRR ITA No.21 of 2002Date of Decision: 18.02.2020
Manoj Kumar, Prop., M/s Medicare Surgicals, Ludhiana
Versus
Appellant
Commissioner of Income Tax, Ludhiana and another
Respondents
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN
Present:Mr. Alok Mittal, Advocatefor the appellant,
Mr. Rajesh Katoch, Senior Standing Counsel withMs. Pridhi Jaswinder Sandhu, Junior Standing Counselfor the Revenue.
AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral)
((((
)*+This appeal was filed under Section 260A of the IncomeTax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,Chandigarh in ITA No.277/Chandi/93 for the assessment year 1989-90.
),+Learned counsel for the appellant states that he has noinstructions. Even otherwise, we find that amount involved is paltry.)3+Dismissed for non-prosecution, with liberty to revive theappeal if something survives therein,
)9+since the main case is dismissed, the pending application,if any, stands disposed of.
JUDGE
February 18, 2020panka] baweja
I. Whether speaking/ reasoneda. Whether reportable
JUDGE
Yes/No
Yes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.