Case LawHigh Court › Manoj Kumar v. Commissioner Of Income Ta...

Manoj Kumar v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ludhiana And Another

High Court 18 Feb 2020 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Manoj Kumar v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ludhiana And Another
Date of order
18 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
1989-90
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Manoj Kumar v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ludhiana And Another, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: Whether speaking/ reasoneda.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

445IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH RRR ITA No.21 of 2002Date of Decision: 18.02.2020 Manoj Kumar, Prop., M/s Medicare Surgicals, Ludhiana Versus Appellant Commissioner of Income Tax, Ludhiana and another Respondents CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN Present:Mr. Alok Mittal, Advocatefor the appellant, Mr. Rajesh Katoch, Senior Standing Counsel withMs. Pridhi Jaswinder Sandhu, Junior Standing Counselfor the Revenue. AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral) (((( )*+This appeal was filed under Section 260A of the IncomeTax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,Chandigarh in ITA No.277/Chandi/93 for the assessment year 1989-90. ),+Learned counsel for the appellant states that he has noinstructions. Even otherwise, we find that amount involved is paltry.)3+Dismissed for non-prosecution, with liberty to revive theappeal if something survives therein, )9+since the main case is dismissed, the pending application,if any, stands disposed of. JUDGE February 18, 2020panka] baweja I. Whether speaking/ reasoneda. Whether reportable JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan