Case LawHigh Court › Manoj Shah v. Joint Commissioner Of Inco...

Manoj Shah v. Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 17 Apr 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Manoj Shah v. Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
17 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Manoj Shah v. Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.550 OF 2008 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.272 OF 2008 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. OF 2008 Manoj Shah .. Applicant Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax Special Range-22, Mumbai .. Respondent Mr.A.K.Jasani for the applicant Mr.R.G.Bhat for the respondent CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & SANTOSH BORA, JJ. SANTOSH BORA, JJ.DATED : 17TH APRIL, 2008 DATED : 17TH APRIL, 2008 P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. By this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking condonation of 58 days’ delay caused in filing the Appeal. For the reasons stated in the affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion, sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay, and there is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). 2. Place the Appeal on board for admission in the month of August, 2008, subject to numbering. (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (SANTOSH BORA, J.) (SANTOSH BORA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan