Manotosh Kumar Datta v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata &Ors
High Court
18 Sep 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_appellate_side
Parties
Manotosh Kumar Datta v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata &Ors
Date of order
18 Sep 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Manotosh Kumar Datta v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata &Ors, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
18.9.2023 ks sl. 4
ks WPA 21246 of 2023
Manotosh Kumar Datta
Vs
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Kolkata &Ors.
Mr. Mukti Chandra Ghosh,Mr. Triptimoy Talukdar
… For the Petitioner.
Mr. Aryak Dutt
… For the Respondents.
Affidavit-of-service filed by the petitioner be keptwith the record.
Heard learned Advocates appearing for the parties. Petitioner has filed this writ petition having agrievance that his application under Section 154 of theIncome Tax Act, 1961, has not been disposed of andthe Assessing Officer concerned is sitting over it.
Mr. Dutt, learned Advocate appearing for therespondents submits that after filing this writ petitionthe order under Section 154 of the Act on theapplication filed by the petitioner has already beenpassed and submits that the same will be officiallycommunicated to the petitioner within a week thoughhe has handed over a copy of the said order upon thelearned Advocate appearing for the petitioner.
Considering the facts and circumstances of thecase and submission of the parties this writ petitionbeing WPA 21246 of 2023, is disposed of by directingthe respondents authority concerned to serve a copy of
the order in question passed under Section 154 of theAct on the petitioner, within a week from date and ifpetitioner is aggrieved by such order, he is at liberty totake appropriate recourse available to him under thelaw.
( Md. Nizamuddin, J. )
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.