Case LawHigh Court › Manpowergroup Services India Pvt. Ltd v....

Manpowergroup Services India Pvt. Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds)-1, N.delhi & Anr

High Court 27 Sep 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Manpowergroup Services India Pvt. Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds)-1, N.delhi & Anr
Date of order
27 Sep 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Manpowergroup Services India Pvt. Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds)-1, N.delhi & Anr, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Decision: Havingheard learned counsels, we direct Respondent No.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~31 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+W.P.(C) 10498/2019 & CM APPL. 43363/2019 MANPOWERGROUP SERVICES INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... PetitionerThrough:Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Advocate.versusThrough:Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Advocate.versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS)-1, N.DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through:Ms. Lakshmi Gurung, SeniorStanding Counsel with Mr. TusharGupta, Junior Standing Cousnel. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAO R D E R%27.09.2019 1. Issue notice. Learned counsel for the Respondents accepts notice. 2. The limited grievance of the Petitioner is that the Petitioner’s revisionpetition under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act which is pending againstthe order dated 10.05.2019 under Section 197 of the Act for the financialyear 2019-20 is not yet been decided and the pendency of that revisionpetition is causing prejudice to the Petitioner on a day to day basis. Havingheard learned counsels, we direct Respondent No. 1 to decide thePetitioner’s aforesaid pending revision petition within next six weeks bygiving a reasoned order. 3. The Petitioner shall appear before Respondent No. 1 on 01.10.2019 at11:00 AM for directions. We have not made any observations on merits and in case the Petitioner is aggrieved by any order passed by Respondent No. 1,the remedies of the Petitioner are preserved.4. Dasti under the signatures of Court Master. VIPIN SANGHI, J SEPTEMBER 27, 2019nk SANJEEV NARULA, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan