In Mansingka Industries Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax And Others, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In view of the said consent terms, the Petition stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONWRIT PETITION NO.1156 OF 2007
Mansingka Industries Ltd.Vs.The Commissioner of Income Taxand others
..Petitioner
..Respondents
Ms.Asifa Khan for the Petitioner.Mr.Ashok Kotangale for the Respondents.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &V.C.DAGA, JJ.DATE : 18TH JUNE, 2007P.C..Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.Both the parties have arrived at certain consentterms. The said consent terms have been duly signedby the respective Counsel for the parties and the sameis taken on record and marked as "X" for
identification. In view of the said consent terms,
the Petition stands dismissed.
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue