Case Law › High Court › Maples Paper Udyog Private Limited v. In...

Maples Paper Udyog Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 16(3), Delhi (Earlier Income Tax Officer, Ward 16(2), Delhi

High Court 18 Oct 2019 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

18 Oct 2019

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Maples Paper Udyog Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 16(3), Delhi (Earlier Income Tax Officer, Ward 16(2), Delhi, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

$~46. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11104/2019 MAPLES PAPER UDYOG PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Prakash Kumar, Adv. versus INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 16(3), DELHI (EARLIER INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 16(2), DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Lakshmi Gurung with Mr. Siddharth Gupta, Advs. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA O R D E R% 18.10.2019 C.M. No. 45714/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 11104/2019 & C.M. No. 45713/2019 After detailed submissions, on learned counsel for the respondent bringing to the notice of this Court, the recent decision of the Supreme Court in Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) – 1 v. NRA Iron & Steel Pvt. Ltd., (2019) 412 ITR 161 SC, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Dismissed as withdrawn. It shall be open to the petitioner to raise all its pleas at the appropriate stage. VIPIN SANGHI, J OCTOBER 18, 2019 N.Khanna SANJEEV NARULA, J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.