Mascot Footcare v. Commissioner Ofincome Tax (Appeals), Faridabad>
High Court
12 May 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Mascot Footcare v. Commissioner Ofincome Tax (Appeals), Faridabad>
Date of order
12 May 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Mascot Footcare v. Commissioner Ofincome Tax (Appeals), Faridabad>, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
2023:PHHC:081406-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH
LTA-64-2012
Date ofdecision:-12.05.2023
Mascot Footcare, Faridabad
..Appellant
VS;
Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Faridabad
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRIHON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRAHON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA
Present:Mr. Pankaj Jain, St. Advocate withMr. Shakti Singh, AdvocateMr. Shakti Singh, Advocate
for the appellant,
Ms. Pridhi Jaswinder Sandhu, Standing counselfor the respondent-department,for the respondent-department,
...
Ritu Bahri, J.
For detail order, see order passedin |ITA No, 192-20) titled as
Mascot Footcare vs. Commissioner ofIncome Tax (Appeals), Faridabad>
decided on even date.
(RITU BAHRI)JUDGE
12.05.2023
(s Aror
(MANISHA BATRA)JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned
Whether reportable
Yes/No
Yes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue