Mavilayi Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Thecommissioner Of Income Tax, Calicut[2019 (2) Khc 287
High Court
26 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Mavilayi Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Thecommissioner Of Income Tax, Calicut[2019 (2) Khc 287
Date of order
26 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Mavilayi Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Thecommissioner Of Income Tax, Calicut[2019 (2) Khc 287, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI
WEDNESDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 7TH PHALGUNA, 1941
WP(C).No.5529 OF 2020(M)
PETITIONER/S:
NARUVAMOODU SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO.160,REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, NARUVAMOODU.P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT PIN-695020
BY ADVS.SRI.ARJUN RAGHAVANSRI.ADITHYA RAJEEV
RESPONDENT/S:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,BHAVAN, KOWDIAR.P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN-695003
WARD-2(2), OFFICE OF THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, AAYAKAR
2THE COMMISSIOINER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS),AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN-695003
BY SC SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON26.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.5529 OF 2020 2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 26th day of February 2020
Heard Sri. Arjun Raghavan, the learned counsel for
the petitioner and Sri. Christopher Abraham, thelearned Standing Counsel for respondents.
2.
Petitioner refers to and relies on judgment
dated 01.07.2019 in W.A No.1536 of 2019 and connected
cases to contend that the Division Bench directeddisposal of appeal and granted stay of recoveryproceedings during the pendency of the appeal.
3.
The learned Standing Counsel admits that the
facts of the case are substantially same and similar tothe facts noted by the Division Bench in W.A. No.1536 of2019, hence can be followed.
Hence, the writ petition is disposed of directing
the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/ 2[nd]respondent to consider and dispose of the statutoryappeal filed by the petitioner herein at the earliesttaking note of the Full Bench decision reported in The
Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd, v. TheCommissioner of Income Tax, Calicut[2019 (2) KHC 287]
and to keep in abeyance recovery proceedings andcollection of tax assessed, pending disposal of suchappeal.
Sd/-
S.V.BHATTI
JUDGE
uu
27.02.2020
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDERFOR THE YEAR 2017-2018 DATED 23.12.2019FOR THE YEAR 2017-2018 DATED 23.12.2019
EXHIBIT P2A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED UNDER SECTION 156 OF THE INCOME TAXACT DATED 23.12.2019UNDER SECTION 156 OF THE INCOME TAXACT DATED 23.12.2019
EXHIBIT P3A TRUE COPY OF THE ONLINE APPEAL DATED 22.01.2020 ALONG WITH GROUNDSOF APPEAL, FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT, AGAINST EXT.P1 ASSESSMENT ORDERDATED 22.01.2020 ALONG WITH GROUNDSOF APPEAL, FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT, AGAINST EXT.P1 ASSESSMENT ORDER
EXHIBIT P4A TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN EXT.P3 APPEAL SUBMITTED ON 24.02.2020FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN EXT.P3 APPEAL SUBMITTED ON 24.02.2020
EXHIBIT P5A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 19.07.2019 IN W.A. NO.1639/201919.07.2019 IN W.A. NO.1639/2019
EXHIBIT P6A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 17.02.2020 IN WP(C)NO.4433/202017.02.2020 IN WP(C)NO.4433/2020
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.