Mavilayi Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Thecommissioner Of Income Tax, Calicut[2019 (2) Khc 287
High Court
25 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Mavilayi Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Thecommissioner Of Income Tax, Calicut[2019 (2) Khc 287
Date of order
25 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
2012-13, 2017-18
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Mavilayi Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Thecommissioner Of Income Tax, Calicut[2019 (2) Khc 287, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI
TUESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 6TH PHALGUNA, 1941
WP(C).No.5438 OF 2020(D)
PETITIONER/S:
MUDAVANMUGHAL SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED NO.T 847,POOJAPPURA.P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, KERALA,PIN-695 012, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
BY ADVS.SRI.C.A.JOJOSMT.SWATHY S.
RESPONDENT/S:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD -2(1).KOWDIAR,TRIVANDRUM-695 003WARD -2(1).KOWDIAR,TRIVANDRUM-695 003
2COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-1OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),TRIVANDRUM-695 003
JOSE WINSON FOR CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON25.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.5438 OF 2020 2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 25th day of February 2020
Heard Sri. C.A.Jojo, the learned counsel for the
petitioner and Sri. Jose Winson holding forSri.Christopher Abraham, the learned Standing Counselfor respondents.
2.Petitioner refers to and relies on judgment
dated 01.07.2019 in W.A No.1536 of 2019 and connected
cases to contend that the Division Bench directeddisposal of appeal and granted stay of recoveryproceedings during the pendency of the appeal.
3.
The learned Standing Counsel admits that the
facts of the case are substantially same and similar tothe facts noted by the Division Bench in W.A. No.1536 of2019, hence can be followed.
Hence, the writ petition is disposed of directingthe Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/ 2[nd]respondent to consider and dispose of the statutoryappeal filed by the petitioner herein at the earliest
taking note of the Full Bench decision reported in The
Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd, v. TheCommissioner of Income Tax, Calicut[2019 (2) KHC 287]
and to keep in abeyance recovery proceedings andcollection of tax assessed, pending disposal of suchappeal.
Sd/-
S.V.BHATTI
JUDGE
uu
27.02.2020
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDERFOR AY 2012-13 DATED 09.12.2019 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENTFOR AY 2012-13 DATED 09.12.2019 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P2A TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE U/S. 156 DATED 09.12.2019 ISSUED BYTHE FIRST RESPONDENTU/S. 156 DATED 09.12.2019 ISSUED BYTHE FIRST RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P3A TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FOR AY 2012-13 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 10.01.20202012-13 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 10.01.2020
EXHIBIT P4A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDERFOR AY 2017-18 DATED 21.12.2019 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENTFOR AY 2017-18 DATED 21.12.2019 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P5A TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE U/S. 156 DATED 21.12.2019 ISSUED BYTHE FIRST RESPONDENTU/S. 156 DATED 21.12.2019 ISSUED BYTHE FIRST RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P6A TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FOR AY 2017-18 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 16.01.20202017-18 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 16.01.2020
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.