Case LawHigh Court › M.ayyankalai v. Income-Tax Department,O/...

M.ayyankalai v. Income-Tax Department,O/O.the Principal Director Of Income-Tax(Investigation)Chennairep By Sri.g.ajay Robin Singh

High Court 09 Jan 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · mdubench
Parties
M.ayyankalai v. Income-Tax Department,O/O.the Principal Director Of Income-Tax(Investigation)Chennairep By Sri.g.ajay Robin Singh
Date of order
09 Jan 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In M.ayyankalai v. Income-Tax Department,O/O.the Principal Director Of Income-Tax(Investigation)Chennairep By Sri.g.ajay Robin Singh, the High Court (2018) decided the matter under Section 276C of the Income-tax Act.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Thirtieth day of January Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice P.RAJAMANICKAM CRL OP(MD) No.87 of 2018AND CRL MP(MD)NO.22 OF 2018 M.AYYANKALAI, ... PETITIONER /PETITIONER Vs INCOME-TAX DEPARTMENT,O/O.THE PRINCIPAL DIRECTOR OF INCOME-TAX(INVESTIGATION)CHENNAIREP BY SRI.G.AJAY ROBIN SINGH, S/O.A.GUNASEKARAN,ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, INVESTIGATION UNIT 1,MADURAI. ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein andin the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to To call for records in C.C.N.16 of 2016 on the file of the IAdditional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai against the petitionerto prosecute for not filing returns of income for assessment years2008-2009, 2009-2010, 2010-2011, 2012-2013 and for furnishing falseinformation under 276C(1) and 277 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 andquash the same and render justice. Prayer in CRL MP(MD). 22/ 2018 :To dispense the appearance of the petitioner in proceedings inC.C.No.16 of 2016 on the file of the 1st Additional Chief Judicialmagistrate, Madurai under section 276C(1) and 277 of the Income TaxAct, 1961 until the disposal of the main quash petition and renderjustice. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing thepetition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of MR.JAWAHAR, Advocate for the petitioner and of M/S.SRIMATHI,Advocate for the Respondent the court made the following order:- At request of the learned counsel post the matter on15.02.2018, for filing counter. Interim order already granted is extend till then. sd/- 30/01/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO THE 1ST ADDITIONAL CHIEFJUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.87 of 2018 AND CRL MP(MD)NO.22/2018 Date :30/01/2018 SMA/CM-VR/SAR-1/05.02.2018:2P/2c
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan