Mc/1691/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Williamson Tea Assam Ltd
High Court
17 Feb 2012 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · asghccis
Parties
Mc/1691/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Williamson Tea Assam Ltd
Date of order
17 Feb 2012
Assessment year(s)
1998-99
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Mc/1691/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Williamson Tea Assam Ltd, the High Court (2012) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
MC 1691/2011BEFOREHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROYHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. SAIKIA
(Amitava Roy, J)
This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for condonation of delay of 299 days in filing the accompanying appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 preferred against he judgment and order dated 31.8.2007
passed by the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Gauhati Bench, Guwahati inITA No. 35(Gau)/02 and CO No. 9(Gau)/06 for the assessment year 1998-99.
We have heard Mr Sarma, Advocate for the applicant and Dr. Saraf, SeniorAdvocate assisted by Ms N Hawelia, Advocate for the opposite party.
An affidavit-in-opposition has been filed on behalf of the opposite party resisting the prayer for condonation of delay.
Upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on a consideration of the averments in their pleadings, we are of the view that in the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for condonation of delay ought to be allowed.
This is more so in view of the exhaustive analysis made by this Court inCommissioner of Income Tax-vs- M/s Williamson Tea (Assam) Ltd., (2011) 6 GLR 110 bearing an identical prayer.
In the above view of the matter, the aforementioned delay is condoned.
We make it clear that in condoning the delay we have not touched upon th
e merits of the appeal.
Misc. case stands allowed in the above terms.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.