Case LawHigh Court › Mc/487/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Ta...

Mc/487/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Assam Mineral Development Corporation Ltd

High Court 27 May 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · asghccis
Parties
Mc/487/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Assam Mineral Development Corporation Ltd
Date of order
27 May 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mc/487/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Assam Mineral Development Corporation Ltd, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Decision: Under the circumstances we allow the application and condone the delay i n filing the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
MC 487/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR MADAN B.LOKUR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. MERUNO There is a delay of 17 days in filing the appeal by the Revenue. We have gone through the averments made in the application for condonation of delay and have also heard learned counsel for the assessee. It is stated in the application that the preparation of the appeal took some time since certain formalities were required to be completed. It is stated that even though the case papers were handed over to learned counsel within timebut due to some procedural formalities the process could not be completed within time. We are satisfied with the explanation given by the Revenue for the delayin filing the appeal. Under the circumstances we allow the application and condone the delay i n filing the appeal. Misc Case stands disposed of.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan