Case Law › High Court › Mca/461/2017 Of The Principal Commission...

Mca/461/2017 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji v. The Azmane Urban Co-Operative Credit Society Ltd

High Court 22 Aug 2017 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · hcbgoa

Parties

Date of order

22 Aug 2017

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Mca/461/2017 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji v. The Azmane Urban Co-Operative Credit Society Ltd, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Amrut IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.461 OF 2017 IN STAMP NUMBER MAIN NO. 2115 OF 2016 The Principal Commissioner of Income TaxVersusThe Azmane Urban Co-Operative Credit Society Ltd …Applicant …Respondents Ms S Linhares, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr SR Rivankar,Advocate for the Respondents. PC:- CORAM:G.S. PATEL & NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, JJDATED:22nd August 2017 1.There is a delay of three days in filing the Tax Appeal. Wecondone it. There is an explanation. We find it adequate. 2.The Misc. Civil Application is disposed of in these terms. 3.List the Tax Appeal subject to numbering on 19th September2017. NUTAN D. SARDESSAI J. G. S. PATEL J.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.