Mca/700/2004 Of Hydroflex Equipment Ltd. And Anr v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax

(Spl.-H.C.A.S.,C.D.,78-e) FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOAAPPELLATE SIDE MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 700 OF 2004 IN TAX APPEAL NO.39 of 2002 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Note, Office Memoranda of Quorum, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s Orders orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. E. P. Badri Narayanan, advocatefor the applicants. Mr. S. R. Rivankar, advocate forthe respondent. CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE &N.A. BRITTO, JJ.DATE : 7th December, 2004. P.C.: Mr. Badri Narayanan had caused his appearance on behalf ofthe assessee and the appeal has beenadmitted by Order dated 5th August,2002. 2. This application has been moved by Mr. Badri Narayananseeking leave to withdraw hisappearance on behalf of the originalassessee as Mr. Badri Narayanan hasbeen appointed as AdditionalStanding Counsel for the Union ofIndia. Notices were issued to the respondents and none appears forrespondent no.1. 3. Notice was issued and theoffice report shows that when freshservice was sought to be caused onthe Managing Director, ShriMadhusudan Joshi, his wife refusedto accept the said notice on behalfof her husband. assessee Company has not respondedto the Court notice and it isnecessary for the Company to causeits appearance in Tax Appeal No.39/2002. 5. We, therefore, allow thisapplication and direct the registryto issue a fresh notice to theoriginal assessee returnable afterfour weeks. Mr. Badri Narayananalso undertakes to intimate to the said Company about this Order.Application disposed of accordingly. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. N.A. BRITTO, J. mc.