Case Law › High Court › Mca/717/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Mca/717/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji Goa v. M/S Damodar Mangalji And Mining Company,Panaji Goa

High Court 04 Oct 2004 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · hcbgoa

Parties

Date of order

04 Oct 2004

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Mca/717/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji Goa v. M/S Damodar Mangalji And Mining Company,Panaji Goa, the High Court (2004) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

(Spl. - H.C.A.S. C.D., 78-e) FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOAPANAJI – GOAAPPELLATE SIDE MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 717 OF 2004 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Quorum appearances, Court's orders, or directions and Court's or Judge's Orders. Registrar's orders. Mr. S. R. Rivonkar, Advocate for theApplicant. Mr. A. J. Kenkre, Advocate for theRespondent. CORAM : B. H. MARLAPALLE & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. DATE : 4TH OCTOBER, 2004. P.C.:- This application has beenmoved to correct the Cause Title of theAppeal Memo in Tax Appeal No. 8 of2004. It is stated that the name of theRespondent is required to be correctedas “M/s. Damodar Mangalji MiningCompany”. The application is allowed. Amendment in the AppealMemo be carried out within one week. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. N. A. BRITTO, J.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.