Case LawHigh Court › Mca/7/2022 Of The Income Tax Officer v....

Mca/7/2022 Of The Income Tax Officer v. The Official Liquidator

High Court 10 Jun 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Mca/7/2022 Of The Income Tax Officer v. The Official Liquidator
Date of order
10 Jun 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mca/7/2022 Of The Income Tax Officer v. The Official Liquidator, the High Court (2022) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM(Original Jurisdiction) In the matter of the Companies Act, 1956 and In the matter of M/s.Elcera Substrates Ltd. (In Liquidation) M.C.A. No.7/2022 in C.P.No.2/2003 Before: The Honourable Mr. Justice N.NAGARESH Friday, the 10[th] day of June 2022/20[th] Jyaishta, 1944 Petitioner The Income Tax Officer, Ward (1), Palakkad. Respondent The Official Liquidator, High Court of Kerala,Representing M/s.Elcera Substrates Ltd. (In Liquidation) Misc. Company Application under Rule 177 of the Companies (Court) Rules,1959 filed by the applicant above named praying for an order to:- i)Condone the delay of 3970 days in preferring the claim by theRevenue before the Official Liquidator, High Court of Kerala representingM/s.Elcera Substrates Ltd. (In Liqn.) ii)Permit the Revenue to prefer the claim before the Official Liquidator,High Court of Kerala representing M/s.Elcera Substrates Ltd. (In Liqn.)within such time as may be prescribed by the Hon' High Court. iii)Pass such other order or orders as may be deemed fit and proper inthe premises of the case. This Application coming on for orders on this day upon hearingSri.P.K.Ravindranatha Menon (Sr) & Sri.Jose Joseph, Standing Counsel, Govt ofIndia (Taxes) for the petitioner and Sri.K.Moni, Standing Counsel for OfficialLiquidator, the Court passed the following:- N.NAGARESH, J --------------------------------------------- M.C.A.No.7 of 2022 in C.P.No.02 of 2003 ------------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 10[th]day of June, 2022. O R D E R The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Palakkad seeks to condone the delay of 3970 days in preferring a claim by the Revenue, before the OfficialLiquidator. Taking into consideration the averments made in the affidavit filed by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to condone the delay. Accordingly,the delay of 3970 days in preferring the claim by the Revenue before theOfficial Liquidator is condoned. The Revenue may prefer their claimsbefore the Official Liquidator within a period of two weeks. Sd/- smm N.NAGARESH JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan