Mca/789/2004 Of V.m. Salgaocar And Brother Pvt.ltd v. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax(Assessment) And
High Court
20 Oct 2004 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
Mca/789/2004 Of V.m. Salgaocar And Brother Pvt.ltd v. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax(Assessment) And
Date of order
20 Oct 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Mca/789/2004 Of V.m. Salgaocar And Brother Pvt.ltd v. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax(Assessment) And, the High Court (2004) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
(Spl. - H.C.A.S. C.D., 78-e)
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOAPANAJI – GOAAPPELLATE SIDEMISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 789/2004 inWRIT PETITION NO.289/2001
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Quorum appearances, Court's orders, or directions and Court's or Judge's Orders.
Registrar's orders.
Mr. A.F. Diniz, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr. S.R. Rivonkar, with Ms. A. Phadte,Advocates for respondents No.1 and 2.
Mr. N.K. Sawaikar, Addl. Central Govt.Standing Counsel for respondents No. 3.
CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE &
N.A. BRITTO, JJ.
DATE : 20TH OCTOBER, 2004.
P.C.
Heard the learned Counsel forthe respective parties. Theapplication is allowed in terms of para(3).
Issue a fresh writ.
B.H. MARLAPALLE, J.
ssm
N.A. BRITTO, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue